Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Dark Knight Rises (2012)


 Director:  Christopher Nolan

With a broken, saddened heart I’ll say that I truly feel many strong emotions over the senseless tragedy that occurred during a screening of this movie.  One day, I might write an essay on the topic, but the focus of this piece is going to be kept on the movie itself.  The connection between the movie and the events is impossible to ignore, admittedly, but had it not happened I would have written a review anyway – and this is my attempt at creating that. 

Christopher Nolan and the production team (actors, cinematographer, production designer, etc.) that he surrounds himself with are functioning at the top of their movie-making game.  In 2005, Batman Begins was released amid much speculation, being that the previous screen incarnations of Batman had become, and remain today, a laughable joke.  Batman Begins soared on many levels and left people, including myself, saying WOW, NOW THIS IS HOW IT’S DONE!  Taking story elements from several 1980’s comics writers (such as Frank Miller) to explain how Bruce Wayne really became Batman, the film took many liberties with the material and created a singular vision that remains fascinating to watch today.  In 2008, The Dark Knight further pushed the boundaries of “license” with the material and proved that in the hands of this team (and I say team because a movie is not solely made by one person), the legend of Batman was respected, safe, and receiving potentially the greatest treatment on screen that it ever will.  Serious actors, crisp dialogue, strong character development, bold production sequences, and a story line that weaves in parallels to emotions and events in our real world made these movies (more so in The Dark Knight) a must-see experience.  Famously, the death of Heath Ledger, who made himself immortal in the role of the Joker, was the first headline grabbing event that impacted how people perceived and approach this evolving movie series.  It was clear by the end of The Dark Knight that we were watching greatness take place on screen – pure movie magic. 

So, The Dark Knight Rises arrives with a heavy burden.  Can it live up to the greatness of the preceding movies?  Will people find the baddie (Tom Hardy’s Bane) as irresistible to watch as Ledger’s Joker?  Will the supposed conclusion to this epic trilogy provide a satisfying ending for both the “comic fan” and the average movie goer? 

My answer to each of these questions is a resounding YES.  The Dark Knight Rises is a truly epic film.  In production scale and vision of story, it is BIGGER than The Dark Knight and Batman Begins put together.  Let me say, THESE MOVIES ARE NOT FOR CHILDREN UNDER 13.  The tensions created in The Dark Knight Rises feel real.  Many people die.  Chaos reigns in Gotham City for much of the movie.  The images are often very tough to watch.  The action set pieces in this movie are flawlessly executed.  The boom of an explosion rocks you and the landing of a punch is felt in your seat.  These are truly top notch production values.

The acting crew once again brings near perfection to the roles.  A special call out to Christian Bale who has given us a wonderful vision of Bruce Wayne, a hero so personally affected by tragic circumstances that he turns himself into a personification of pure will power.  Joseph Gordon Levitt joins that cast as an idealistic young cop named John Blake.  He turns in a great performance and represents true good behavior and honest intentions in a city so rotted by class warfare and evil intentions.  One scene in The Dark Knight Rises is breathtaking in that they create a moment where the “cops” and “thugs” have a battle on the streets of Gotham, which has been so ravaged by Bane (Tom Hardy, pure evil behind the mask) and the battle is like a modern day moment right out of Braveheart.  Sides line up and war is brought to our immediate home fronts.  It is chilling.

The storyline focuses on Bane’s attempts to bring wreckage to Gotham City while Bruce Wayne (Batman), having taken the blame for Harvey Dent’s crimes at the end of The Dark Knight has become older and retired from crime fighting.  He’s pushed back into the game to handle Bane – whose dependency on a medication fed to him through the claw-like mask he wears gives him incredible physical strength – and Batman finds Bane could be more than he can manage.  Brutal fist fights occur.  A twisty story line is played out.  Without giving anything away, at the end of the movie I was both roused out of my seat and left with a deep urge to watch the movie again immediately. 

People in the theater stood up and applauded as the credits rolled.  It’s rare this happens at a screening of a movie.  I’ll never know if all the applause was for the movie itself or possibly a reaction to the recent surrounding events.   Regardless, high art deserves acclaim and recognition and this movie is, in my opinion, a prime example of high art in blockbuster movie-making.  I applaud this movie and the Nolan Trilogy of Batman films.  They’ll stand the test of time.  I’ve heard it said that to know if a movie is great is to wait 10 years and see if people are still interested in it.  We’ll see what happens, but I’ve got a pretty good idea. 

It may sound cheesy, but to the makers of these films I say THANK YOU.  This is why I love the movies. 

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)


Director:  Marc Webb

 It’s impossible not to recognize the obvious question when discussing the new film The Amazing Spider-Man…is it too soon for a reboot (or is one really necessary at all)?  Ok, so that’s two questions.  Well, I’ll say this about that.  Marvel, the comic book publisher of Spider-Man comics, has done a terrific job of building a movie enterprise out of The Avengers, which began in 2008 with Iron Man and, over the course of 4 additional entries, built slowly into the payoff of this summer’s kick-off film, The Avengers.  This is an example of the movies modeling what comics have done (albeit on a much smaller budget) for years – providing heroes like Iron Man and Thor with their own comics to headline while bringing them together for a mash-up of sorts in The Avengers comic line.  So, in spirit of transitioning the business model comics have employed for decades over into the movie business, we now have a new version of Spider-Man “drawn” by a new artist.  It’s as simple as that. 

I thought this new version of Spider-Man was appropriately timed in its release this summer, arriving at theatres between The Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises.  The Avengers was the pinnacle of comic-to-screen look and feel.  The action soared and the characters/colors felt torn right from the pages.  It was picture-perfect, a superhero blast of a movie.  Now, in contrast, The Dark Knight Rises promises to be spectacular in its own way.  I’m ready for more doom and gloom in the hands of Christopher Nolan, the director who has truly created a singular on-screen vision for the Caped Crusader that reflects our current political and economic climate.  Stuck right in the middle is The Amazing Spider-Man, a  movie that wants to be both real (Peter Parker in skinny jeans and a hoodie and quirky, shy-guy mannerisms) and spectacular.  At times it can feel disjointed.  Bringing the more realistic approach to the film didn’t always work for me.  It was handled best in Peter’s interactions with Captain Stacy (father of Peter’s love interest Gwen Stacy).  In these scenes Andrew Garfield was able to layer the foundation of a more confident Peter Parker, a boy becoming a man and learning to stand up for his beliefs. 

To add, I didn’t feel I needed to see a Peter Parker who can get bruised, cut, and bleed like the rest of us.  This added-reality element really works for Batman (as he is a tortured soul anyway) but not for Spider-Man.  Let’s face it, Spider-Man is at best a fantasy for little boys to watch and read about.  Peter is a good kid to whom something magical happens, but he still has to learn to uphold his values and remain a contributing member of society.  He has to learn the Golden Rule, Do unto others…

As for the added backstory of Peter’s parents, I felt it was just not needed and a bit distracting.  Also, just as I was thinking I was witnessing the first Spider-Man movie that would not leave me with anything truly amazing, the climactic battle sequence between the Lizard and Spider-Man was presented.  It was a visual and technical achievement of the highest order, with a nice blend of heartfelt support thrown in for Peter from the public who has learned that he is trying to help (much better than the bridge sequence at the end of the 2002 Spider-Man).
So, was this new version of Spider-Man necessary?  I don’t know, and to be honest I don’t really care.  I do know this – little boys (and those boys who grew up in the age of blockbuster cinema) all over the world love to see Spider-Man swinging between tall buildings and those in the audience (my son included) seemed to love it.  That makes it worth it to me.