Director: Stephen Chbosky
So, The Perks of being a Wallflower was
marketed as a modern day answer to the now classic John Hughes films of the
Eighties era. The kind of movie that
would give you the inside scoop on high school and show you the TRUTH about the
hell that those four years can be. The
story is most certainly a “high school” movie.
A movie about the wounded youth that walk the halls and specifically
what has wounded them. With focus on the
wounds themselves and recognizing that there’s much more to deal with than just
the bully who knocks the books from your hands or the problem you have in
getting up the courage to ask a girl out, the story finds a way to transcend
just being another “high school” movie.
First, let
me say kudos to Logan Lerman (who plays Charlie, the story’s central
character). This kid is simply terrific
in the movie. His acting is never forced
and the honesty in which he embodies the character is fascinating to
watch. This is a guy I’ve seen in Percy
Jackson and some other kind of bad movies, but here he delivers a touching,
soulful performance. He’s going to be
one to watch, if he stays attached to the right material. His character, Charlie, is a troubled young
man who we know at the outset has had his share of issues. He has no real friends
at school when the story begins and the movie centers on the connection he
makes with two particular outsiders (he’s a freshman and they are seniors, which
is a perfect way to immediately clue you in on the old soul that Charlie
has). They are played by Ezra Miller
(also a huge find and I expect to see more of him) and Hermione herself, Emma
Watson. They fit the roles perfectly and
individually they do a fantastic job in the film, a very true job of acting
such that it seems effortless.
I hate to
give away any major plot points so I’ll just try to illustrate as best I can
why I think this movie is special. The
film is written and directed by the author of the acclaimed novel on which it
is based. This doesn’t happen that
often. The author was allowed to present
his vision on screen and, while I haven’t read the novel yet, it does feel like
a writer’s film. There is specific,
choice voiceover and narration through certain points of the film. I gathered he knew the right words to pluck
from his source material.
My wife and
I both felt like the movie took a little bit of time to really get into the
story and where it was going, but by the end I think we were both similarly
floored. This can be a common experience
when a film is made from a novel. Novels
allow cultivation and take time to expand the story in a way that can come
across as slow in a movie. I won’t say
the direction was perfect or any sign of a major filmmaker, but I can say that
I felt like he succeeded in delivering a story that feels urgent, personal, and
vital.
We all
would probably agree that high school sucks.
The movie takes us far enough into the world to recognize this as a
fact, but doesn’t pretend to be the first movie to do so. The story goes deeper in a way that I was
very moved by.
This one’s
a journey and one that I urge you to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment